![peachtree windows peachtree windows](https://pic.ebid.net/upload_big/4/7/6/uo_1499112782-32254-42.jpg)
In its answers to plaintiff's interrogatories, Peachtree admitted it manufactured the sample window, but denied it designed or manufactured the strand board display and handle, or attached the handle to the strand board display. In its answer filed on October 9, 2009, Peachtree denied liability, and asserted that individuals and/or entities over whom it had no control were liable for plaintiff's alleged injuries. Plaintiff did not name any fictitious parties. Plaintiff also alleged that Peachtree was strictly liable for the sample window's design and manufacturing defects and failure to properly affix the handle to the strand board display. On August 20, 2009, plaintiff filed a complaint against Peachtree, alleging that Peachtree had negligently attached the handle to the strand board display with two screws instead of the four screws indicated by the handle assembly. Plaintiff had the sample window in his possession for approximately one month prior thereto, and had used it approximately fifteen times without incident. On August 23, 2007, plaintiff was allegedly injured when a screw on one end of the handle "popped out" strand board display while he was removing the sample window from the trunk of his car. In the course of his in-home demonstrations, plaintiff used a sample window that was encased in a strand board display having an attached handle. Plaintiff was employed as an in-home sales specialist by Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. The following facts are derived from evidence submitted by the parties in support of, and in opposition to, the summary judgment motion, viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff. (Peachtree).1 Plaintiff also appeals from the Octoorder, which denied his motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff James Reardon appeals from the SeptemLaw Division order, which granted summary judgment to defendant/third-party plaintiff Peachtree Doors and Windows, Inc. Naulty, Scaricamazza & McDevitt,LLC., attorneys for respondent DAC Products, Inc. Lavin, O'Neil, Ricci, Cedrone & Disipio, attorneys for respondent Peachtree Doors and Windows, Inc.
#PEACHTREE WINDOWS PRO#
of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellant (Mr. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No.